Sammanfattning
Main evaluation method: mixed-methods, synthesis analysis, literature review.
Positives: Across Zambia and South Sudan, Sida-supported interventions generated tangible benefits for poor populations, including improved incomes, food security, and access to essential services. In Zambia, interventions performed better as the systems are relatively stable while in South Sudan contributions have helped sustain basic services under extreme and fragile conditions.
Shortcomings: The impact results from Sida’s work were uneven and remained limited in scale and transformative impact. Impact measures were often constrained by underuse of existing evidence in contribution designs and weak evaluability. Heavy reliance on partner-reported data, limited triangulation, and insufficient use of national data systems further created a verification gap and constrained deeper analysis.
Annexes:
- Annex 1: Executive Summaries of Impact Studies
- Annex 2: Summary of impact results from 8 cases in Zambia and South Sudan (See link for annex 1)
- Annex 3: Synthesis of Impact and Evidence Use Across Zambia, South Sudan and Wider Experiences
- Annex 4: How Can Evaluation Commissioners Think About Impact Assessments Going Forward?
- Annex 5: Sida staff Contribution Management Survey results
Tematik: FattigdomHälsaJämställdhet
Geografiskt område: Global, Sydsudan, Zambia
Språk: Engelska
Publikationsnummer: 2026:1k