Final Report from the Evaluation of Sida’s work with Poverty

  • Year: 2026

  • Part: 10 of 11

  • Publication type: Central evaluation

  • Author: Anne-Lise Klausen, Ayla Kristina Olesen Yurtaslan, Carsten Schwensen, John Rand, Louise Scheibel Smed

Summary

Main evaluation method: mixed-methods, synthesis analysis, literature review.

Positives:  Across Zambia and South Sudan, Sida-supported interventions generated tangible benefits for poor populations, including improved incomes, food security, and access to essential services. In Zambia, interventions performed better as the systems are relatively stable while in South Sudan contributions have helped sustain basic services under extreme and fragile conditions.

Shortcomings: The impact results from Sida’s work were uneven and remained limited in scale and transformative impact. Impact measures were often constrained by underuse of existing evidence in contribution designs and weak evaluability. Heavy reliance on partner-reported data, limited triangulation, and insufficient use of national data systems further created a verification gap and constrained deeper analysis.

  • Topic: GlobePovertyHealthHealthGender equalityGender equality

  • Geographic area: Global, South Sudan, Zambia

  • Language: English

  • Publication number: 2026:1k

Other parts within this publication